
It will be the job of historians over the next generation to adequately depict the legacy left behind by George W. Bush, the 43rd president of the United States. Yesterday, President Bush gave what will be his last press conference in the Brady room of the White House. Mr. Bush appeared ever so defiant and open about his eight years as the leader of the free world. He made the case before the press that to make any real judgments on his legacy at this point in time would be premature and that only time will be the real judge of his presidency. However, to a degree Mr. Bush is correct; time in fact will be the final judge of just how successful or not 43rd was, but the country and the world are currently living testament to the policies of this president and that alone cannot be ignored, nor shall it wait for historians to paint a picture we are all familiar with.
Over the last few weeks since Barack Obama became president-elect, President Bush and his administration have been on what has been deemed a ‘legacy tour’. Vice-President Dick Cheney has been on a number of Sunday morning television shows and made a number of speeches defending the policies of George Bush. Vice-President Cheney reflected on some of the instances in this administration that caused controversy, one being that of torture. Cheney was asked about methods of torture used by the United States against enemy combatants; waterboarding in particular, by veteran CNN host Wolf Blitzer and Cheney admitted in fact that waterboarding was a technique used to gather information from a few terrorists. He claims that it was not a widespread tactic in the administration but that it was done to keep America safe, the bumper sticker of this Bush Administration.
President Bush himself has also done a number of interviews and continues to do so making the case that he did what he felt was right to protect and defend America. However, some have began to ask the question that what happens when your all is not enough? President Bush was questioned yesterday about the federal government’s response to Hurricane Katrina and his judgments on the response. President Bush was very adamant that he did not feel the response to the storm was slow and in fact point out that 30,000 people were rescued from roofs by rescue workers. However, can that alone be what sways public decision to believe otherwise? That the federal response to Katrina was indeed slow? It is not. Seeing people in stadiums on cots for weeks, people who to this day still have not been able to move into their homes, outright incompetence at FEMA cannot be ignored. The United States simply was not prepared and that blames has to be shared by both state and local municipalities along with the federal government.
At that press conference, President Bush was also asked about America’s moral standing around the world and if he believed it was damaged at all. Strikingly, President Bush remarked that he did not agree with the assessment that America’s moral standing around the world had been damaged at all. The fact remains that America’s moral standing has been seriously compromised and no historian is needed to make this conclusion for the American people. When terrorist in Mumbai asked hostages with American passports to be presented, there is no doubt that the world sees America much differently and whether the President has come to terms with this, the fact remains. A commission set up to evaluate that terrorist groups are resurgent and stronger than before the Iraq War are alarming and speak to the notion that the years ahead for America will call for serious changes in our international relations. Our policy towards the Middle East has also brought into question America’s unwavering support of Israel.
With the economy in shambles, President Bush has indicated that he did what he was told by his top economic advisors; and that if something was not done the country would see a depression greater than the great depression. In that aspect, the President does have some standing, however, this crisis did not appear over night and his administration will be judged down the line for what it did not do to prevent the economic crisis.
Whether or not history is kind to Mr. Bush, it will be fair. While we look to the future for ultimate judgment, look back now at the last eight years and wonder if Mr. Bush in fact did his best and was that really enough. Furthermore, another question that we can answer now is do we feel safer before or after the ‘Age of Bush?’